Being a man in my mid thirties, I came of age in the era of Seinfeld. Therefore, I am well versed in finding annoyances in the routines of everyday life. Being a sports fan, I have gathered a collection of these agitating behaviors that can be found almost everywhere games are played.
They are in no particular order, rather they stand as a collective. And now, they are on display for you too. After all, misery sure does love her company.
1) Guy wearing headphones at the game: Hey. Buddy. You're at the game! The person your listening to is describing what you're seeing for people who would like to be where you are, but aren't. If you're at a game and still need someone to explain what you are looking at, you shouldn't be there. Please give your seat up to someone who can watch without an interpreter. Thanks.
2) Guy who yells at officials: Despite popular belief, your yelling from the nosebleeds really won't sway the men in stripes. Your berating of referees/umpires are falling on deaf ears. Actually they're falling on my ears, which are ringing now. Sit down and shut up.
3) Harassing fans of the road team: I know what you're thinking. "But they came into our house. We can't have that happen." Well, then maybe your team's fans should have bought more tickets. Besides I'm not talking about good-natured ribbing. That's to be expected. I'm talking about berating, throwing things, and trying to start a fight with someone who just wanted to take a trip and see their team in a different venue. Your city thanks you for giving them a black eye because of your idiocy. Yes, I'm talking to you Eagles fans!
4) Tucking in/ Blousing a jersey: Everyne knows you don't have the physique of the namesake stitched onto the back of your jersey. But this "fashion statement" goes well beyond hiding that pot belly. It's a jersey! If it was supposed to be tucked in, it would be called a dress shirt! Untuck, grab a beer, and start enjoying life!
5) Grown Men who Bring Gloves to a baseball game: Seriously? You're 45. Odds are your "cat-like" reflexes have probably diminished to the point where you can't even react to that hard hit ball. If a ball is hit into your section, just duck and let the kids have a shot at it. Which brings me to my next pet peeve...
6) Grown man who "fights" a child for a Baseball: You are the absolute lowest form of sports fan. Not only should you be kicked out of the game. You should just be kicked. What if someone did that to your kid. Oh, wait, you don't have any. That's why you're hear fighting my kid for a baseball.
7) Face Painters: Warriors used face paint to strike fear into their foes. Who are you trying to scare, the attractive woman in the third row? Well, you did it. Mission accomplished chief!
8) Fans who use "We" when referencing their team: I'm sorry, I didn't see your name in the media guide. What year were you drafted? Sorry to ruin your dream of playing Center Field for the New York Yankees, but you didn't make it. THEY play baseball. YOU watch, like the rest of us.
9) "Pink" Sportswear for the ladies: Disclaimer- If it is for Breast Cancer Awareness, I'm all for it. However, if it's a fashion statement your trying to make. I don't approve. Sports is about rooting for a team, not looking cute. You're a fan of the Packers, but yellow and green don't bring out your eyes? Too bad, be a fan and where your team's colors!
10) Guy who stands up every time puck passes blue line at a hockey game: This is an offense more visible to TV viewers. We get it. You are at the game & now you're on TV too. Good for you. Now sit down so the adults can watch the game. Thanks. This also applies to the guy on his cell phone behind home plate. What do you want me to do, wave back? Have a little class. Those seats are expensive. Act like you've been there before.
Note: This post is written VERY tongue in cheek. In no way is it meant to offend anyone. We all need to be able to laugh at ourselves. And more importantly, at others.
-Mike Tursi
Tuesday, April 27, 2010
Wednesday, March 24, 2010
America's True Pastime Is Ready To Return
"The one constant through all the years, Ray, has been Baseball. America has rolled by like an army of steamrollers. It has been erased like a blackboard. Rebuilt. And erased again. But Baseball has marked the time. This field, this game. It's a part of our past Ray. It reminds us of all that once was good. And it could be again."- Terrence Mann (Field Of Dreams)
Baseball isn't just another sport we get excited for each year. It's our pastime, our passion. And, it's no coincidence that it's return coincides with the return of Spring. Spring is about rebirth. A clean slate. A chance to start anew. Like being a child again. That is why Baseball is so dear to us. It reminds us of our childhood, when the world was full of promise and hope. When anything was possible, and each day was a fresh start.
But baseball also links us to our heritage. You think about when your Dad took you to games as a child, just like he thinks about when his Dad took him to games when he was young. Sure, the venues have changed. But the game remains the same as it always was, acting as a beacon guiding our hearts to a place where hope and promise are still a possibility, no matter how dark the times. Because our nation has endured a great many things, both joyous and tragic. And through it all, there was baseball. It was that way in the past. It is that way now. And, it will be that way long after you and I are gone.
So as the days grow longer and begin to push back the night. As the breeze carries warmer air on it's wings. Know that is is here. Our pastime has returned. Baseball has come to make us feel good again!
-Mike Tursi
Baseball isn't just another sport we get excited for each year. It's our pastime, our passion. And, it's no coincidence that it's return coincides with the return of Spring. Spring is about rebirth. A clean slate. A chance to start anew. Like being a child again. That is why Baseball is so dear to us. It reminds us of our childhood, when the world was full of promise and hope. When anything was possible, and each day was a fresh start.
But baseball also links us to our heritage. You think about when your Dad took you to games as a child, just like he thinks about when his Dad took him to games when he was young. Sure, the venues have changed. But the game remains the same as it always was, acting as a beacon guiding our hearts to a place where hope and promise are still a possibility, no matter how dark the times. Because our nation has endured a great many things, both joyous and tragic. And through it all, there was baseball. It was that way in the past. It is that way now. And, it will be that way long after you and I are gone.
So as the days grow longer and begin to push back the night. As the breeze carries warmer air on it's wings. Know that is is here. Our pastime has returned. Baseball has come to make us feel good again!
-Mike Tursi
Wednesday, March 3, 2010
I'm Divorcing The Philadelphia Flyers
The following blog was originally written for The Hockey Herald and can be found there by following this link: http://www.thehockeyherald.com/?p=3000
After 30 years of marriage, I'm leaving the Philadelphia Flyers. The reasons can be filed under irreconcilable differences which culminated in today's non activity at the NHL Trade Deadline. This breakup was not brought about by today's inactivity alone. Rather, it was caused, over the years, by issues that led to the necessity of today's inactivity.
One of our major issues is the Flyers lack of fiscal responsibility. Though I said I'd stand behind them no matter what, I have become disenfranchised with them throwing dollar after dollar at players past their prime who, in the end, bring nothing but hardship and stress to our marriage. Some were fleeting, and easy to get over. Adam Oates and Paul Coffey immediately come to mind. Others were more difficult to forgive. I still bear the scars of Luke Richardson, Mike Rathje, Chris Gratton, and Scott Hartnell, to name a few. And after those players leaves, I'm left to pick up the pieces and tell them "Thanks for trying, at least I know you want to win."
Another issue we have is the Flyers failure to find responsible insurance to look after our most prized possessions. They haven't provided a quality goaltender since our tenth wedding anniversary, the end of Ron Hextall's first tour of duty. Over the past 20 years they bought bogus policies off of everyone from Dominic Roussell to Roman Cechmanek. But, when we needed the goaltending to be there the most, it was nowhere to be found. I still can't believe I let them talk me into Jeff Hackett!
The final reason, and this one may be a bit vain, is that their old friends, who are quite arrogant and stubborn, are always around. And, it's apparent that they mean more to the Flyers than I do. The Flyers say they need these people around because they are a link to the glory days, the foundation on which the Flyers legacy was built. But, I wasn't even born when those Stanley Cups were won. And the game has changed so much since then. I appreciate friendship and loyalty as much as anyone. But, know your friends limitations. Maybe the Flyers shouldn't have let Bob Clarke be the GM for so long. I mean, the man is still fighting The Cold War. I thought that when they replaced him with Paul Holmgren things would change. But, alas, it's just more of the same. Dinosaurs trying to survive in a world that no longer exists for them. The Flyers have insisted on giving these "Friends" important jobs in the organization. They wouldn't listen to my plea to move on from them in order to save our marriage.
After our last separation in 2004, when the Flyers and I were apart for a year. They came back and promised me they would be different. They would try to make our marriage work within the new rules of the NHL. But they quickly reverted to their old ways and signed Derian Hatcher, a typical "Flyers" guy. and so, that spring, without fail, they left me broken hearted once more.
It wasn't always this way. There were plenty of good times. The 35 game unbeaten streak when we were newlyweds. And even though we were robbed that night on Long Island by Bobby Nystrom, I knew that there were good times ahead. The runs to the Stanley Cup Finals in '85 and '87. Hanging out with The Legion Of Doom.
But, the problems began to outweigh the good times. And the Flyers most recent failures with their roster, both financially and in the misjudgment of talent, and their stubborness to move on from the past, has left me with no other recourse. And, today was the result of those failures. The Flyers are no longer able to do the things needed to make this marriage work. So, I must let them go. But know that I do so with a full heart. I won't find another team, that would be too awkward. Even though that Patrick Kane is a lot fun to watch.
-Mike Tursi
Tuesday, March 2, 2010
2010 Winter Games & NHL
Below is a link to my collaborative article with Crash The Crease blogger Dustin Leed. We discuss hockey's impact on the average sports fan during The Games, and the pros and cons of the NHL sending players to Sochi in 2014.
http://www.crashthecrease.com/2010/03/02/2010-winter-games-the-aftermath/
-Mike Tursi
http://www.crashthecrease.com/2010/03/02/2010-winter-games-the-aftermath/
-Mike Tursi
Wednesday, February 17, 2010
An Open Letter To Philadelphia Sports Fans
Dear Philadelphia Sports Fans,
I know, more often than not, we do not see eye to eye. Despite sharing the same neighborhood, we are vastly different. I don't even have a rooting interest in most of your teams. Except the Flyers, and I take issue with some of their fans too. Though not always, I tend to side with the national media's perception of you But, you have to admit, you don't make it easy to defend some your actions. Snowballs at Santa, Booing a possibly paralyzed Dallas Cowboys wide receiver.
Well, enough about that. I'm writing to tell you that, on the topic of Donovan McNabb... You are right! The national media has been in love with McNabb since the day he was drafted. And, I guess I can see why. From a distance, he seems to be very successful (for more on this phenomenon, see Peyton Manning). But a closer look reveals that McNabb isn't all that the sports pundits make him out to be. By the numbers, his career may, in deed, land him in the Hall of Fame (For more on this see one of my previous posts: http://bit.ly/4r16Uu ). But in a league where ultimate success is measured by Playoff performances, most notably, Super Bowl championships, he falls remarkably short and deserves your questioning of his abilities, if not your venom.
In the future, the McNabb era may be reflected upon with a measure gratitude. After all, the Eagles have been one of the 21st century's most successful NFL franchises. But they have repeatedly fallen short of their ultimate goal. And, it should be noted, they've fallen short of that goal, more times than not, as favorites. McNabb's Eagle teams have always beaten the opponents they were supposed to, during the regular season, before the pressure got taken up a notch. In a league where team success greatly relies on quarterback success, McNabb and the Eagles don't measure up.
So, don't let the national media bash you on this one. Arm yourself with the stats. But also arm yourself with the story. McNabb certainly isn't Ryan Leaf. But when the day is done, he'll be a lot closer to Dan Marino than he will be to Joe Montana.
Your friend,
Mike Tursi
I know, more often than not, we do not see eye to eye. Despite sharing the same neighborhood, we are vastly different. I don't even have a rooting interest in most of your teams. Except the Flyers, and I take issue with some of their fans too. Though not always, I tend to side with the national media's perception of you But, you have to admit, you don't make it easy to defend some your actions. Snowballs at Santa, Booing a possibly paralyzed Dallas Cowboys wide receiver.
Well, enough about that. I'm writing to tell you that, on the topic of Donovan McNabb... You are right! The national media has been in love with McNabb since the day he was drafted. And, I guess I can see why. From a distance, he seems to be very successful (for more on this phenomenon, see Peyton Manning). But a closer look reveals that McNabb isn't all that the sports pundits make him out to be. By the numbers, his career may, in deed, land him in the Hall of Fame (For more on this see one of my previous posts: http://bit.ly/4r16Uu ). But in a league where ultimate success is measured by Playoff performances, most notably, Super Bowl championships, he falls remarkably short and deserves your questioning of his abilities, if not your venom.
In the future, the McNabb era may be reflected upon with a measure gratitude. After all, the Eagles have been one of the 21st century's most successful NFL franchises. But they have repeatedly fallen short of their ultimate goal. And, it should be noted, they've fallen short of that goal, more times than not, as favorites. McNabb's Eagle teams have always beaten the opponents they were supposed to, during the regular season, before the pressure got taken up a notch. In a league where team success greatly relies on quarterback success, McNabb and the Eagles don't measure up.
So, don't let the national media bash you on this one. Arm yourself with the stats. But also arm yourself with the story. McNabb certainly isn't Ryan Leaf. But when the day is done, he'll be a lot closer to Dan Marino than he will be to Joe Montana.
Your friend,
Mike Tursi
The Debate: NHL Players In The Olympics
My original idea for this post was to show that as North American professional sports leagues became more worldly, the debate should be laid to rest as to whether or not it's fair that pro athletes be allowed to compete for their country. After all, this isn't 1992, when a Dream Team of NBA superstars traveled to Barcelona & wreaked havoc on the Basketball events of the summer games.
But an unofficial poll on such social networking sites as Twitter and Facebook has shown me that there are many people who are very much divided on the topic. And, I found that it wasn't nessecarily about balance of competition, or even whether pros should be allowed to compete in what is usually an ametuer event. Rather, the biggest debate was about how the layoff will effect the league that the players regularly play in.
This has become a bit of a moot point for the NBA, since basketball is a summer event and the NBA plays during the fall and winter months. But, in hockey, it's quite a hot topic, because the NHL is forced to take a two week hiatus. So who's right and who's wrong. I'll give you both sides, then I'll give you my opinion. After that, you can decide for yourself.
Pros:
The NHL is no longer a North American league. It may be the most global of the four major sports on the continent. This influx of European and Russian athletes has infused a sort of Olympic feel in the league's day to day operations (The NHL even experimented with a North America vs. The World All Star format). Allowing it's players to compete on a world stage can only help grow a sport so desperately seeking real estate among it's bigger, more popular brothers.
Piggy-backing on the above point; having NHL players guarantees world class competition. Each game in the tournament is a mini All Star game. Again, not a bad showcase for a sport trying to grow in popularity.
Olympic teams have competitive balance. Unlike the 1992 Dream Team, allowing NHL players to compete for their countries has leveled the playing field.
The stereotype regarding the desires of the athletes are no longer divided by region. It was always presumed that North American players grew up with dreams of winning a Stanley Cup over an Olympic Medal. Conversely, it was assumed that players who came from overseas to play in the NHL didn't have the passion to strive for the Stanley Cup and were only here to collect a paycheck and showcase their talents. Now all players get to compete for both. North American players learned the value of playing for their country while European and Eastern Asian players developed a desire to compete for Lord Stanley's Cup. *NOTE* I stress that these are stereotypes. In no way am I disputing the validity of an athletes desire to compete. At any level, or for any trophy.
Cons:
What about the NHL? Is a two week hiatus a good thing for a league trying to grow in popularity. Sure, hockey fans will be paying attention to the Olympic Games. And it doesn't hurt that the host country is hockey crazed Canada. But, the lights will be turned off for two weeks. Any modest fan who was becoming a little more curious about the NHL might be turned off, especially since NBC hasn't done much to put hockey at the forefront of its broadcasts. You have to do a little channel surfing to find the games. Will that mildly curious fan just stick to alpine skiing and figure skating? Even Snowboarding gets billing over hockey on the NBC network of Olympic channels. Does the NHL, and the game of hockey itself, need another sport to compete with? *NOTE* Hockey can be found on every channel in Canada, this argument only applies to the United States Markets.
Team momentum will no doubt be affected by the break. Teams like the Flyers, who had just seemed to find a positive rhythym, are stopped in their tracks. And who knows if they can find that groove again when play resumes. This works both ways. Teams on slides, the Devils and Penguins come to mind, could be aided by the break. It might allow them to regroup and come back with a new slate to work with. My point is, how is that fair to the competitive balance of a league which has obviously worked very hard to achieve such a balance in the first place.
Chemistry is another element bound to be affected. Most of the league's players are home with family, while a small percentage rev up the concentration levels to compete for their countries. This may cause teammates and linemates to be on different pages when play resumes.
Injury and fatigue are probably the biggest points in the argument against NHL players in the Winter Games. Yes, we all have National Pride, even million dollar athletes. But these men collect paychecks from teams counting on them to produce revenue, excitement, and ultimately, a championship for their fan base. What if one of them is seriously injured during the Olympics? It would not only impact that player's season, but quite possibly, the fate of his team. After all, we're not talking about the Donald Brashears of the NHL playing in this tournament. It's the Crosbys and Ovechkins. Players that the NHL depends on. Also, it is said that The Stanley Cup just might be the hardest trophy to win in all of sports. The NHL Playoffs are a grueling marathon. How will players respond after having already exhausted so much in pursuit of Olympic glory?
My Take:
Despite the risk of losing the casual viewer, or even losing a player for the season due to injury. I like having NHL Players in the Olympics. I've long said, you're either a fan of hockey, or you're not. The NHL shouldn't concern itself with chasing casual fans. It has one of the most loyal fan bases in all of sports, and should play to that strength. As for injury; any one of us could get hurt walking down the street, that shouldn't even be an argument.
The Olympics create a unique opportunity to showcase the many talented athletes who play in the NHL, and can provide hockey fans everywhere with an opportunity to witness the game played at it's highest level. And if the casual fan wants to hop on board for the ride, so be it.
Lastly, as I mentioned above, we all have National Pride. It's not the players fault that some smart business men decided to start leagues that allowed lots of people the opportunity to make lots of money. National pride knows no dollar sign. If my country has terrific players, I want them playing for my team to help my country gain international bragging rights.
- Mike Tursi
But an unofficial poll on such social networking sites as Twitter and Facebook has shown me that there are many people who are very much divided on the topic. And, I found that it wasn't nessecarily about balance of competition, or even whether pros should be allowed to compete in what is usually an ametuer event. Rather, the biggest debate was about how the layoff will effect the league that the players regularly play in.
This has become a bit of a moot point for the NBA, since basketball is a summer event and the NBA plays during the fall and winter months. But, in hockey, it's quite a hot topic, because the NHL is forced to take a two week hiatus. So who's right and who's wrong. I'll give you both sides, then I'll give you my opinion. After that, you can decide for yourself.
Pros:
The NHL is no longer a North American league. It may be the most global of the four major sports on the continent. This influx of European and Russian athletes has infused a sort of Olympic feel in the league's day to day operations (The NHL even experimented with a North America vs. The World All Star format). Allowing it's players to compete on a world stage can only help grow a sport so desperately seeking real estate among it's bigger, more popular brothers.
Piggy-backing on the above point; having NHL players guarantees world class competition. Each game in the tournament is a mini All Star game. Again, not a bad showcase for a sport trying to grow in popularity.
Olympic teams have competitive balance. Unlike the 1992 Dream Team, allowing NHL players to compete for their countries has leveled the playing field.
The stereotype regarding the desires of the athletes are no longer divided by region. It was always presumed that North American players grew up with dreams of winning a Stanley Cup over an Olympic Medal. Conversely, it was assumed that players who came from overseas to play in the NHL didn't have the passion to strive for the Stanley Cup and were only here to collect a paycheck and showcase their talents. Now all players get to compete for both. North American players learned the value of playing for their country while European and Eastern Asian players developed a desire to compete for Lord Stanley's Cup. *NOTE* I stress that these are stereotypes. In no way am I disputing the validity of an athletes desire to compete. At any level, or for any trophy.
Cons:
What about the NHL? Is a two week hiatus a good thing for a league trying to grow in popularity. Sure, hockey fans will be paying attention to the Olympic Games. And it doesn't hurt that the host country is hockey crazed Canada. But, the lights will be turned off for two weeks. Any modest fan who was becoming a little more curious about the NHL might be turned off, especially since NBC hasn't done much to put hockey at the forefront of its broadcasts. You have to do a little channel surfing to find the games. Will that mildly curious fan just stick to alpine skiing and figure skating? Even Snowboarding gets billing over hockey on the NBC network of Olympic channels. Does the NHL, and the game of hockey itself, need another sport to compete with? *NOTE* Hockey can be found on every channel in Canada, this argument only applies to the United States Markets.
Team momentum will no doubt be affected by the break. Teams like the Flyers, who had just seemed to find a positive rhythym, are stopped in their tracks. And who knows if they can find that groove again when play resumes. This works both ways. Teams on slides, the Devils and Penguins come to mind, could be aided by the break. It might allow them to regroup and come back with a new slate to work with. My point is, how is that fair to the competitive balance of a league which has obviously worked very hard to achieve such a balance in the first place.
Chemistry is another element bound to be affected. Most of the league's players are home with family, while a small percentage rev up the concentration levels to compete for their countries. This may cause teammates and linemates to be on different pages when play resumes.
Injury and fatigue are probably the biggest points in the argument against NHL players in the Winter Games. Yes, we all have National Pride, even million dollar athletes. But these men collect paychecks from teams counting on them to produce revenue, excitement, and ultimately, a championship for their fan base. What if one of them is seriously injured during the Olympics? It would not only impact that player's season, but quite possibly, the fate of his team. After all, we're not talking about the Donald Brashears of the NHL playing in this tournament. It's the Crosbys and Ovechkins. Players that the NHL depends on. Also, it is said that The Stanley Cup just might be the hardest trophy to win in all of sports. The NHL Playoffs are a grueling marathon. How will players respond after having already exhausted so much in pursuit of Olympic glory?
My Take:
Despite the risk of losing the casual viewer, or even losing a player for the season due to injury. I like having NHL Players in the Olympics. I've long said, you're either a fan of hockey, or you're not. The NHL shouldn't concern itself with chasing casual fans. It has one of the most loyal fan bases in all of sports, and should play to that strength. As for injury; any one of us could get hurt walking down the street, that shouldn't even be an argument.
The Olympics create a unique opportunity to showcase the many talented athletes who play in the NHL, and can provide hockey fans everywhere with an opportunity to witness the game played at it's highest level. And if the casual fan wants to hop on board for the ride, so be it.
Lastly, as I mentioned above, we all have National Pride. It's not the players fault that some smart business men decided to start leagues that allowed lots of people the opportunity to make lots of money. National pride knows no dollar sign. If my country has terrific players, I want them playing for my team to help my country gain international bragging rights.
- Mike Tursi
Sunday, January 31, 2010
A Perception of Philadelphia Sports Fans; From The Inside
This past Saturday, I took a ride to visit my parents. The 40 minute ride, spent listening to Sports Talk Radio, was just long enough for me to become even more perplexed at the attitude of the average Philadelphia Sports fan.
Now, before you bash this post. Or lambaste me as an outsider who doesn't understand what it means to be a Philly sports fan (more on that later). Let me give you my credentials, which will validate why I can expound on this subject. I was born and raised in South Philadelphia, mere blocks from the sports complex. I am a lifelong Flyers fan, though I don't have a rooting interest in the other pro sports teams who reside here. I have attended Flyers, Sixers, Eagles, and Phillies games quite frequently throughout my life. I am a proud Philadelphian. Also, I have traveled to many other sporting venues, both famous and infamous, and have seen how the other half lives. Such trips include Wrigley Field, Fenway Park (for Yankees/ Red Sox), Yankee Stadium, The Belle Centre in Montreal, Le Collise in Quebec, the then named Corel Centre in Ottawa, both the Capital Center and Verizon Center in Washington, The Miami Arena in Florida. I have spent significant time in Pittsburgh, Michigan, and New York among other places.
Now that you know about where I'm coming from, let's start start with why I got the idea for this post in the first place. Friday night, Kobe Bryant, supposed Phialdelphia Son, came to Philly with the Lakers for a less than anticipated matchup with the Sixers. Kobe was booed. And the venom had spilled over onto Saturday's air waves. They talked about how Kobe doesn't respect his roots, talked about how he wanted to "rip Philly's heart out" in the 2001 NBA Finals, and my favorite... he was a Mets fan growing up. I took issue with most of these. And came up with a laundry list of things I still don't get about Philly sports fans.
I get the passion. I appreciate the passion. It is better here than in most other sports cities. But it's misplaced... maybe misrepresented. There is a small town atmosphere that hovers over this city. And it leads to an almost single mindedness when it comes to sports. An athlete must be a blue collar type, hard nosed and willing to crash into a wall. That's why Lenny Dykstra and Bobby Clarke are adored here. It's also why athletes with tremendous ability, like Mike Schmidt, are regarded with an air of caution. He (Schmidt) was so good, he made it look easy. Too easy. People say he didn't try hard enough.
Also, if you are from within these city limits, you are expected to carry that passion for Philly wherever you go. And if you don't, you are scorned. And if you aren't from here. People think you should just go away, because you are not one of them and couldn't possibly understand. Meaning, you don't know what you're talking about.
But, the behavior that perplexes me the most is the outrage one receives if someone from Philly is not a fan of one the city's four professional teams. It goes back to that single mindedness that I mentioned earlier. They won't talk about other teams on the airwaves, you're shooed off the air if you even try to bring it up. If you are a fan of another team, you're deamed a fraud, a bandwagon jumper, and your knowledge on the subject of sports will be forever speculated with no real basis.
I can't explain why this attitude persists here. Maybe it's jealousy? Jealousy of more successful cities with more successful franchises. I think it's the losing. Sure, teams win here. But it's in spurts. Glimpses of winning sandwiched between decades of frustration. Whatever the reason, it confounds me. And it will continue to confound me.
-Mike Tursi
Now, before you bash this post. Or lambaste me as an outsider who doesn't understand what it means to be a Philly sports fan (more on that later). Let me give you my credentials, which will validate why I can expound on this subject. I was born and raised in South Philadelphia, mere blocks from the sports complex. I am a lifelong Flyers fan, though I don't have a rooting interest in the other pro sports teams who reside here. I have attended Flyers, Sixers, Eagles, and Phillies games quite frequently throughout my life. I am a proud Philadelphian. Also, I have traveled to many other sporting venues, both famous and infamous, and have seen how the other half lives. Such trips include Wrigley Field, Fenway Park (for Yankees/ Red Sox), Yankee Stadium, The Belle Centre in Montreal, Le Collise in Quebec, the then named Corel Centre in Ottawa, both the Capital Center and Verizon Center in Washington, The Miami Arena in Florida. I have spent significant time in Pittsburgh, Michigan, and New York among other places.
Now that you know about where I'm coming from, let's start start with why I got the idea for this post in the first place. Friday night, Kobe Bryant, supposed Phialdelphia Son, came to Philly with the Lakers for a less than anticipated matchup with the Sixers. Kobe was booed. And the venom had spilled over onto Saturday's air waves. They talked about how Kobe doesn't respect his roots, talked about how he wanted to "rip Philly's heart out" in the 2001 NBA Finals, and my favorite... he was a Mets fan growing up. I took issue with most of these. And came up with a laundry list of things I still don't get about Philly sports fans.
I get the passion. I appreciate the passion. It is better here than in most other sports cities. But it's misplaced... maybe misrepresented. There is a small town atmosphere that hovers over this city. And it leads to an almost single mindedness when it comes to sports. An athlete must be a blue collar type, hard nosed and willing to crash into a wall. That's why Lenny Dykstra and Bobby Clarke are adored here. It's also why athletes with tremendous ability, like Mike Schmidt, are regarded with an air of caution. He (Schmidt) was so good, he made it look easy. Too easy. People say he didn't try hard enough.
Also, if you are from within these city limits, you are expected to carry that passion for Philly wherever you go. And if you don't, you are scorned. And if you aren't from here. People think you should just go away, because you are not one of them and couldn't possibly understand. Meaning, you don't know what you're talking about.
But, the behavior that perplexes me the most is the outrage one receives if someone from Philly is not a fan of one the city's four professional teams. It goes back to that single mindedness that I mentioned earlier. They won't talk about other teams on the airwaves, you're shooed off the air if you even try to bring it up. If you are a fan of another team, you're deamed a fraud, a bandwagon jumper, and your knowledge on the subject of sports will be forever speculated with no real basis.
I can't explain why this attitude persists here. Maybe it's jealousy? Jealousy of more successful cities with more successful franchises. I think it's the losing. Sure, teams win here. But it's in spurts. Glimpses of winning sandwiched between decades of frustration. Whatever the reason, it confounds me. And it will continue to confound me.
-Mike Tursi
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
.jpg)